In recent months, influential voices including Bill Gates, CEOs, and futurists have floated the idea that AI could let us move toward a two or three-day work week within the next decade. The promise is tantalising: more free time, less burnout, possibly better wellbeing. But it comes with serious caveats, especially about pay, inequality, and what gets lost if work just gets compressed rather than reduced.

Here’s a look at the opportunities, the risks, and what policies or norms would need to shift to make a shorter workweek sustainable and fair.

What People Are Saying: The Promise

Supporters of the 3-day week argue that AI could unlock major productivity gains. By taking on many of the repetitive and administrative tasks that fill our schedules, from data analysis to scheduling, machines could free people up to achieve the same output in far less time.

The wellbeing potential is just as compelling. More time for rest, family, hobbies, and personal pursuits could help ease the burnout that has become a defining feature of modern work. Beyond the individual, there are environmental and social gains too. Fewer commutes would cut emissions and ease strain on urban infrastructure, while additional time at home could allow people to engage more deeply in caregiving, volunteering, or community life.

Perhaps most transformative of all, a shorter workweek could change the very nature of jobs. As AI takes care of the basics, human work could shift further toward creativity, empathy, problem-solving, and leadership. In that world, technology does not diminish people but allows them to focus on richer, more meaningful contributions.

​

The Risks and What Could Go Wrong

For all its promise, the 3-day week carries equally serious risks. The most immediate is financial. If fewer days automatically mean less pay, many workers could find themselves worse off while living costs continue to climb. Benefits linked to old definitions of full-time work, such as pensions or health insurance, might also be reduced or lost.

The impact is unlikely to be spread evenly. Jobs in healthcare, education, retail, and transport cannot easily be compressed into three days since they rely on physical presence and irregular hours. These roles may end up excluded while others benefit, creating a two-tier workforce. The knock-on effect is that frontline jobs could become far less appealing. If office-based staff enjoy 3-day weeks while nurses, teachers, and drivers continue to work exhausting schedules, those sectors will face growing recruitment and retention challenges unless they rethink pay, scheduling, and contract models.

Inequality is another concern. If the gains of AI flow mainly to business owners rather than employees, the gap between the two could widen. Even where shorter weeks are adopted, there is a danger that workloads are simply crammed into fewer days, leaving people more stressed than before. And in some cases, automation may not reduce hours at all but rather eliminate roles, displacing workers who may lack the resources to retrain.

Finally, there are broader economic implications. If too many people lose income security, consumer spending will fall and economic stability may be shaken. Social safety nets are not currently designed to absorb such a rapid shift in work patterns.

​

What Would Be Needed to Make It Work

To ensure a 3-day week genuinely improves lives rather than worsening inequality, several changes would be needed.

1. Wage and benefits protection​
   Pay should not simply fall in line with days worked. Either weekly pay must be protected or hourly rates increased, with benefits decoupled from old five-day definitions. For a 3-day week to succeed, pay also needs to be tied to value created rather than hours on the clock, so that employees are rewarded for outcomes and contribution, not penalised for reduced time.
2. Legal and regulatory frameworks​
   Labour laws will need to evolve to guarantee protections against under-employment, maintain minimum standards, and ensure gains from AI productivity are shared fairly.
3. Reskilling and transition support​
   Workers will need help adapting to AI-driven change, especially in sectors where automation could displace roles.
4. Tackling cost of living pressures​
   Housing, energy, and food costs must be addressed if people are to enjoy shorter working weeks without financial insecurity.
5. Fair distribution of AI’s productivity gains​
   Policies and incentives may be needed to ensure companies share the benefits with their workforce, through wages, reduced hours, or profit-sharing.
6. Sector-specific approaches​
   The shift will not look the same everywhere. Pilots, phased rollouts, and industry-specific solutions will be essential.
7. Support for SMEs​
   Small and medium-sized enterprises often feel the sharpest strain from rising taxation, regulation, and tightening margins. For many, investment in new working models feels like a luxury when they are firefighting just to stay stable. Yet SMEs form the backbone of most economies, employing the majority of the workforce. If they are excluded from the transition to shorter weeks, millions of employees could miss out. Targeted support, such as incentives, tax relief, or shared resources, will be essential to ensure SMEs can participate and compete fairly in the new landscape.
8. Organisational structures that unlock value​
   For a 3-day week to be effective, it is not enough for employees to work harder or smarter. Many organisations already struggle with decision bottlenecks, siloed communication, and change fatigue. Productivity gains will only translate into real outcomes if systems, structures, and leadership practices allow value to be realised rather than stalled.
9. Cultural adaptation​
   Society will need to shift expectations around what productivity looks like, how fast services are delivered, and how we value leisure time.

​

What to Watch

• Are governments updating labour laws to protect workers in shorter weeks?
• Are pilots showing positive results not just in productivity, but in human sustainability?
• Are essential costs being managed so that working less does not mean living worse?

​

Getting Ready for What Comes Next

Most forecasts place the 3-day week within a decade. But with AI’s exponential growth, it could come far sooner. The real bottleneck is not technology, it is whether organisations are prepared.

That is why forward-looking leaders are already laying the groundwork:

• Rethinking pay and benefits models so fewer hours does not mean less security
• Experimenting with job redesign, automation, and reskilling
• Building the cultural and structural flexibility to adapt when the moment arrives

Imagine the competitive advantage of being first to market with a fair and sustainable 3-day week. The gains in attraction, retention, and reputation could be transformative.

The future of work may arrive faster than expected. The question is: who’s going to get the early mover advantage?

​About WellWise

WellWise is a trusted solution provider for organisations serious about understanding and improving their people experience. In a space too often dominated by vague insights, assumptions, and surface-level surveys, WellWise brings clarity.

Our pioneering diagnostic is designed to go beyond how people feel - it reveals why those experiences exist in the first place. Built on robust science and aligned with international standards like ISO 45003, our model identifies hidden risks, strategic blind spots, and cultural pressure points that traditional tools miss.

WellWise helps businesses move from confusion to confidence - supporting leadership, strengthening culture, and turning people challenges into strategic progress.

​

Bobbi Hartshorne Founder and CEO of WellWise, Speaker, Author and Podcaster ''I help forward-thinking leaders proactively assess, mitigate, and strategically manager psychosocial risks - driving measurable outcomes for thriving, resilient, and future-ready workplaces.''